bug-mailutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: Compiling mailutils 2.0 on solaris


From: Maarten Thibaut
Subject: Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: Compiling mailutils 2.0 on solaris
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:39:49 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2

Sergey,

Actually, I did see these problems with vanilla 2.0:

libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I../include -I../lib -I../lib -I.. -I../include -I../mailbox -I../libargp -I../libcfg -I../libproto/include -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/var/tmp/mailutils/etc\" -DSITE_VIRTUAL_PWDDIR=\"/var/tmp/mailutils/etc/domain\" -DLOCALEDIR=\"/var/tmp/mailutils/share/locale\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/var/tmp/mailutils/etc\" -g -O2 -MT syslog.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/syslog.Tpo -c syslog.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/syslog.o
syslog.c:30: error: `LOG_AUTHPRIV' undeclared here (not in a function)

Once this is fixed, the next problem is also a known issue:

/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -g -O2   -o aclck aclck.o ../lib/libmuaux.la ../mailbox/libmailutils.la   -lsocket -lnsl -lcrypt -lresolv  -lpthread
libtool: link: gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/aclck aclck.o  ../lib/.libs/libmuaux.a ../mailbox/.libs/libmailutils.so -lsocket -lnsl -lcrypt -lresolv -lpthread -R/var/tmp/mailutils/lib
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
asprintf                            ../mailbox/.libs/libmailutils.so

But I cannot find the "default" fix for this online, except for a hint to use the latest CVS or alpha versions. Which is when I saw the PAM error.

I would gladly use vanilla 2.0, if I can find a fix for the asprintf error.

--
maarten


On 6/23/09 4:12 PM, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
Maarten Thibaut <address@hidden> ha escrit:

  
It seems that this error was already fixed in CVS for version 1.2,
    

Yes, it was.

  
but it has cropped up again in 2.0.
    

No, it was not. It was introduced for a while in one of the alpha
versions. Alpha versions (i.e. those having three decimal numbers) are
not supposed to be reliable.

  
What is the stability and code quality of this project?
    

I use it successfully on many sites, and most of them are quite loaded
ones.

Regards,
Sergey




  


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]