bug-make
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?


From: Jonathan Kamens
Subject: Re: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:32:55 -0500

>  Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:24:10 -0500
>  From: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>
>  
>  This has been fixed in CVS for a while; the fix will be in the next
>  release of GNU make.  If you like I can send you a patch.

Has the bug with multiple pattern-specific assignments for a single
target been fixed as well?  Was the patch I submitted helpful?

Do you have any idea when the next release will be?  I'm not asking
for a commitment, just a ballpark estimate, if you have one.

>  I acknowledge them to the best of my ability.  Have reported bugs that
>  weren't acknowledged?

I don't believe any of these messages were acknowledged:

  Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:03:49 -0500
  From: Jonathan Kamens <address@hidden>
  Message-Id: <address@hidden>
  To: address@hidden
  Subject: make 3.79.1: should have "--no-builtin-includes" option

  Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:38:26 -0400
  From: Jonathan Kamens <address@hidden>
  Message-Id: <address@hidden>
  To: address@hidden
  Subject: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?

  Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:41:42 -0400
  From: Jonathan Kamens <address@hidden>
  Message-Id: <address@hidden>
  To: address@hidden
  CC: address@hidden
  In-reply-to: <address@hidden> (message
          from Jonathan Kamens on Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:38:26 -0400)
  Subject: Re: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?
  References:  <address@hidden>

  Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:35:05 -0400
  From: Jonathan Kamens <address@hidden>
  Message-Id: <address@hidden>
  To: address@hidden
  CC: address@hidden
  In-reply-to: <address@hidden> (message
          from Jonathan Kamens on Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:41:42 -0400)
  Subject: Re: Only one pattern-specific variable assignment per target?
  References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden>

>    jk> P.P.S. Is address@hidden archived anywhere?
>  
>  Sure... see the bottom of each message:

I can't do that, given that I am not a subscriber.

Thanks,

  jik



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]