[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
-include filename does not show correct dependency errors
From: |
willard |
Subject: |
-include filename does not show correct dependency errors |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:59:52 -0800 (PST) |
When using the "-include filename"(instead of just "include filename"), if
this filename includes dependencies that are missing, makefile does not show
those missing dependencies...
For example, if using:
-include foo.d
with foo.d being:
foo.o: foo.c xxx.h
Let's say xxx.h does not exist (and cannot be generated) , the make fails,
but it does not say it's because of xxx.h missing.
If instead, this is used:
include foo.d
then it works fine...
I understand that the '-' in front of include means that THIS file 'foo.d'
should not itself generate an error, but I would expect the content of foo.d
to be used normally....
Looks like a bug to me.
Btw, I am using make 3.81.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-include-filename-does-not-show-correct-dependency-errors-tp21699973p21699973.html
Sent from the Gnu - Make - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- -include filename does not show correct dependency errors,
willard <=
- Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors, Philip Guenther, 2009/01/28
- Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors, willard, 2009/01/28
- Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors, Philip Guenther, 2009/01/28
- Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors, willard, 2009/01/28
- Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors, Philip Guenther, 2009/01/28
- Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors, willard, 2009/01/28
- Re: -include filename does not show correct dependency errors, Paul Smith, 2009/01/28