[bug #30381] Don't avoid implicit rule recursion quite so soon.

[Olexiy Buyanskyy]

Follow-up Comment #9, bug #30381 (project make):

Maybe we can use something like

%(1).foo%(2) : %(1)a%(2)

So your example will look like

%(1).foo : %(1)a%(1)

I agree with Reiner. make can be better and has more features, then current
implementation.

At least all functions from

http://gmsl.sourceforge.net/

can be very good to have in standard make. Basically I see in source some
EXPERIMENTAL blocks already. :-)

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30381>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/