Re: [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch

[Paul Smith]

On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 09:57 +0100, Tim Murphy wrote:
> When most rules are a single job this doesn't seem important but when
> you're doing anything non trivial it becomes hard to see what is
> where.

Just to be clear: in this implementation the output from all individual
commands in a recipe are collected and printed at once.  It's not
actually a per-job thing, but rather a per-target thing.

Don't know if that helps at all (I think it's better this way).