Re: [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch

[David Boyce]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Frank Heckenbach <address@hidden> wrote

This might be right (I was just objecting to your claim that it was
necessarily so on any 32-bit Unix), and I'd prefer to use fd's
anyway.

Well ... Linux is not Unix, as partisans will proudly tell you, so technically what I said is unobjectionable.  I won't pretend that that's what I meant though. Presumably the real distinction is between statically and dynamically linked binaries; anything linked statically with libc would need to contain an actual FILE struct, not just a pointer to one.

But that aside, we're all in violent agreement so we can let this sub-thread drop.

-David