[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option) |
Date: |
Mon, 06 May 2013 20:20:15 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 20:17:50 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:56:48 -0400
> >
> > On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 19:36 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > However, I wonder what was the reason for splitting the definition of
> > > GMK_EXPORT in two, and putting each part in a different file.
> >
> > Well, because the gnumake.h file is intended to be installed into the
> > user's /usr/include or similar, and included in a binary package build
> > of make such as RPM or DEB or whatever, and be included by the user's
> > code, and when it's included there it should NEVER (IIUC) be using the
> > in-make variant.
>
> That's true, but it's common to have the same header be included when
> building the application or library which provides the exported
> services.
>
> > However, if you really want it back the way it was please do choose a
> > more unique name than "MAIN". Something prefixed with "GMK_" at least.
>
> OK, will do.
Done.
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), (continued)
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Paul Smith, 2013/05/04
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/04
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Paul Smith, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Paul Smith, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, David Boyce, 2013/05/05
- Message not available
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Paul Smith, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/01