[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug #49093] ifdef checks for non-empty value, not definition
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [bug #49093] ifdef checks for non-empty value, not definition |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:44:50 -0400 |
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 15:16 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> ...
> > Probably an example like this would help make the doc more clear.
>
> There *is* an example like that in the doc in at least version 4.2.1!
Oh. Yeah. Hah!