Re: Optimization for reading *.d files

[brenorg]

Hi Norbert,

You are absolutely right. There is much more redundancy than I expected. I
joined all .d files in one single file and after running make on it and
printing the database, it's actually 10x smaller. And I know there must be
more duplication since my files names are not all relative to the same root
yet.

I'll continue this path and see if I can get acceptable performance. If not,
I will insist a little bit more on this thread. The build system refactoring
will also allow pluging other builders like Ninja, so I can put this problem
aside for now.

Thanks!
Breno G.



--
View this message in context: 
http://gnu-make.2324884.n4.nabble.com/Optimization-for-reading-d-files-tp17656p17660.html
Sent from the Gnu - Make - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.