|
From: | SF Markus Elfring |
Subject: | Re: Checking software build tries for “commands.cmo” |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:50:13 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 |
> address@hidden:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/20160205/commons> LANG=C make -d > commands.cmo V=1 > … > No implicit rule found for 'commands.cmo'. > Finished prerequisites of target file 'commands.cmo'. > Must remake target 'commands.cmo'. > Successfully remade target file 'commands.cmo'. > make: Nothing to be done for 'commands.cmo'. > > > Now I wonder why I do not get the desired software generation results for > this test case. Why is the source file “commands.ml” not compiled again > in the way as the other one? I have noticed a moment ago that an interface description file was missing somehow for the OCaml source file in this compilation attempt. I have added the following extra rules as a special handling. commands.cmo: commands.ml $(OCAMLC_CMD) -c $< commands.cmx: commands.ml $(OCAMLOPT_CMD) -c $< I wonder then that the make tool did not give me a direct clue for a failed software dependency as I am used to in other cases. Regards, Markus
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |