[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes
From: |
SF Markus Elfring |
Subject: |
Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jun 2017 20:21:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 |
> I don't think that's relevant: a graph's topology isn't dependent
> on the order in which its arcs are enumerated.
I have tried to stress the construction sequence.
> When you submit a test case that demonstrates a bug,
I stumbled on two special cases depending on your view of the corresponding
software situation.
I am unsure if any more evolution will happen there.
> then I'm sure someone will look at it.
Would you like to take another look at a detail from my clarification request
on the topic “Checking file generation for a test script”?
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2017-06/msg00126.html
> Expressions calculating prerequisites are a notable case, causing "variables
> before rules"
> to be one guideline for writing makefiles.
Thanks for your information.
> You claimed that the inability to cancel an explicit rule meant something
> important
I got an acknowledgement that the handling of explicit rules is generally
different
in comparison to implicit rules in specific cases.
> about whether explicit rules or implicit rules should come first.
> Paul prompted you to explain what that was, but you haven't.
I thought that I have tried this.
Now again the documented detail for an ordering constraint:
Implicit make rules can be cancelled. So it is expected that something did exist
to be switched off on concrete demand.
Regards,
Markus
- Re: How to avoid the double execution of a make info call?, (continued)
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, SF Markus Elfring, 2017/06/27
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, SF Markus Elfring, 2017/06/20
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, Paul Smith, 2017/06/20
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, SF Markus Elfring, 2017/06/20
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, Paul Smith, 2017/06/20
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, SF Markus Elfring, 2017/06/21
- RE: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, Martin Dorey, 2017/06/21
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes,
SF Markus Elfring <=
- Message not available
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, SF Markus Elfring, 2017/06/21
- Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes, Henrik Carlqvist, 2017/06/18