bug-mana
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ashen


From: Jeff Russell
Subject: ashen
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:48:01 +0900
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)


Maybe it was to just have something folks could pay attention to, so they wouldn't notice that IBM just dumped a load of bricks on SCO's head.
More on that in a bit.
Let it all play out, and then they will repeal it if it gets bad enough.
I was reminded of this by an email from Marbux, and I asked if I could share it with you.
In other words, it is asking the court to throw out SCO's entire case, and to grant it judgment on two counterclaims without even going to trial on those two.
It's more than twenty, because there are proposed orders too. So we are off and running.
After I digest it all, I'll explain anything needing explanation. The end came to justify the means. It can't be, I thought.
He's not an expert on pretexting. And that is the way the people in our company feel. In other words, it is asking the court to throw out SCO's entire case, and to grant it judgment on two counterclaims without even going to trial on those two.
And that is the way the people in our company feel.
I think he would hope you would rearrange your priorities, if not your ultimate goal, and find a way to do both.
They lost sight of the values that HP has always represented. I hear you say, the fact that SCO has been unwilling or unable to be specific. I think short term strategies have value. More on that in a bit. D-Link Germany GmbH on the losing side tried to allege that the GPL wasn't binding because it violated Germany's antitrust law and interfered with its contracts with third parties. Another secret in SCO's mountain of secret offenses for which they would like IBM to pay them billions. And it's the British Library that is speaking out and saying that the same rules of the road should apply in the digital world as they have always done.
He's not an expert on pretexting. D-Link Germany GmbH on the losing side tried to allege that the GPL wasn't binding because it violated Germany's antitrust law and interfered with its contracts with third parties. Do we just wait for the ultimate solution? She didn't even know what pretexting was.
But this will get you started while I slave away.
More on that in a bit. He agreed I could, so here's his explanation, which I'm sure will help you to understand that win or lose, IBM comes out ahead.
It can't be, I thought. First, though, there is so much to explain.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]