bug-parted
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?


From: H. J. Lu
Subject: Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:19:32 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:18:17AM +1000, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:06:48AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > Kernel reports
> > 
> > Aug 26 10:42:15 hlu kernel: hda: 156355584 sectors (80054 MB) w/1819KiB 
> > Cache, CHS=9732/255/63, UDMA(66)
> 
> Is that the same kernel you used to create the other partition?
> 

The kernel may be different. But they report the same:

hda: 156355584 sectors (80054 MB) w/1819KiB Cache, CHS=9732/255/63, UDMA(66)


H.J.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]