Bug-Report

[Norbert Blenn]

Hi, 
 
sorry, my English is bad :-( 
I use Knoppix 3.3 (2003-09-22) on M300 PIII-600Mhz 
qtpartedgive  the Message: 
----------8<------------ 
address@hidden:~# qtparted & 
[2] 1093 
[1]   Exit 127                qparted 
address@hidden:~# Warning: The partition table on /dev/hda is inconsistent.  
There ar  
e many reasons why this might be the case.  Often, the reason is that Linux 
dete  
cted the BIOS geometry incorrectly.  However, this does not appear to be the 
cas  
e here.  It is safe to ignore,but ignoring may cause (fixable) problems with 
som  
e boot loaders, and may cause problems with FAT file systems.  Using LBA is 
reco  
mmended. 
A bug has been detected in GNU parted.  Please email a bug report to 
bug-parted@  
gnu.org containing the version (1.6.4) and the following message:Assertion 
(ped_  
geometry_test_equal (&part->geom, &old_geom)) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1681 in 
  
function ped_disk_get_max_partition_geometry() failed. 
A bug has been detected in GNU parted.  Please email a bug report to 
bug-parted@  
gnu.org containing the version (1.6.4) and the following message:Assertion 
(ped_  
geometry_test_equal (&part->geom, &old_geom)) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1681 in 
  
function ped_disk_get_max_partition_geometry() failed. 
A bug has been detected in GNU parted.  Please email a bug report to 
bug-parted@  
gnu.org containing the version (1.6.4) and the following message:Assertion 
(ped_  
geometry_test_equal (&part->geom, &old_geom)) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1681 in 
  
function ped_disk_get_max_partition_geometry() failed. 
A bug has been detected in GNU parted.  Please email a bug report to 
bug-parted@  
gnu.org containing the version (1.6.4) and the following message:Assertion 
(ped_  
geometry_test_equal (&part->geom, &old_geom)) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1681 in 
  
function ped_disk_get_max_partition_geometry() failed. 
A bug has been detected in GNU parted.  Please email a bug report to 
bug-parted@  
gnu.org containing the version (1.6.4) and the following message:Assertion 
(ped_  
geometry_test_equal (&part->geom, &old_geom)) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1681 in 
  
function ped_disk_get_max_partition_geometry() failed. 
A bug has been detected in GNU parted.  Please email a bug report to 
bug-parted@  
gnu.org containing the version (1.6.4) and the following message:Assertion 
(ped_  
geometry_test_equal (&part->geom, &old_geom)) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1681 in 
  
function ped_disk_get_max_partition_geometry() failed. 
A bug has been detected in GNU parted.  Please email a bug report to 
bug-parted@  
gnu.org containing the version (1.6.4) and the following message:Assertion 
(ped_  
geometry_test_equal (&part->geom, &old_geom)) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1681 in 
  
function ped_disk_get_max_partition_geometry() failed. 
Error: msdos disk labels do not support partition names. 
Error: The file system is bigger than it's volume! 
Error: msdos disk labels do not support partition names. 
Error: Could not detect file system. 
Error: msdos disk labels do not support partition names. 
Error: Could not detect file system. 
Error: msdos disk labels do not support partition names. 
Error: Could not detect file system. 
Error: msdos disk labels do not support partition names. 
Error: Could not detect file system. 
Error: msdos disk labels do not support partition names. 
Error: Could not detect file system. 
 
[2]+  Done                    qtparted 
address@hidden:~#  
----------8<------------ 
 
fdisk -l: 
----------8<------------ 
address@hidden:~# fdisk -l 
 
Platte /dev/hda: 30.0 GByte, 30005821440 Byte 
240 Köpfe, 63 Sektoren/Spuren, 3876 Zylinder 
Einheiten = Zylinder von 15120 * 512 = 7741440 Bytes 
 
     Gerät boot.  Anfang      Ende    Blöcke   Id  Dateisystemtyp 
/dev/hda1   *         1         6     45328+   b  Win95 FAT32 
/dev/hda2             7       169   1232280    b  Win95 FAT32 
/dev/hda3           170      1863  12806640    c  Win95 FAT32 (LBA) 
/dev/hda4          1864      3876  15218280    f  Win95 Erw. (LBA) 
/dev/hda5   *      1864      2896   7809448+  83  Linux 
/dev/hda6   *      2897      2962    498928+  82  Linux Swap 
/dev/hda7   *      2963      3876   6909808+   b  Win95 FAT32 
address@hidden:~#  
----------8<------------ 
 
and hdparm -i /dev/hda 
----------8<------------ 
address@hidden:~# hdparm -i /dev/hda 
 
/dev/hda: 
 
 Model=FUJITSU MHR2030AT, FwRev=30B8, SerialNo=NJ11T24153CP 
 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs } 
 RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4 
 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16 
 CurCHS=17475/15/63, CurSects=16513875, LBA=yes, LBAsects=58605120 
 IORDY=yes, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} 
 PIO modes:  pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4  
 DMA modes:  mdma0 mdma1 mdma2  
 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5  
 AdvancedPM=yes: mode=0x80 (128) WriteCache=enabled 
 Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 1:  
 
 * signifies the current active mode 
 
address@hidden:~#  
 
----------8<------------ 
 
thx 
Norbert