[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How about simply include files?

From: Sven Luther
Subject: Re: How about simply include files?
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:47:23 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 02:58:29AM +1100, Stewart Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 10:43, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> > I have never used either, but have a mild preference for arch.
> > 
> > What does everyone else think?
> After much swearing, some handholding and reading a few sets of docs
> (also thinking a bit) i've actually gotten my head around a few parts of
> arch (the tla implementation). It's quite nice - has the bits of bk i
> want, and it's free!
> the whole distributed thing and easy mirrors rock.
> subversion fixes up a few of the problems of CVS - but the arch approach
> seems to be nicer. just be aware that 1/2 the people are quite helpful,
> and the other 1/2 just want to abuse you for "not reading the tutorial"
> - when really you have, about 3 times and just want help on how to do
> something "simple".

I was told that with arch, you have to forget about easily getting info
on the changes on a precise file (like cvs log blah.c and cvs diff -r1.4
blah.c), which is a feature rather usefull to have.

Andrew, and report on the project you asked ?


Sven Luther

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]