bug-parted
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How Come?


From: Andrew Clausen
Subject: Re: How Come?
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:30:16 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:06:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> My plan is for having : 
> 
> 
> parted--mainline--1.6.6 -----> bugfix branch
>        |
>        V
> parted--devel--1.6.7 -> parted--mainline--1.6.7 -----> bugfix branch
>        |
>        V
> parted--devel--1.6.8 -> parted--mainline--1.6.8 -----> bugfix branch

Is this the standard approach?

Did you mean parted--mainlain--1.6 and parted-devel--1.7 ?

I think for 1.6.x, the releases (1.6.6, 1.6.7, etc.) should be snapshots
of the branch at "suitable points", because bug-fixes only get
incorporated into the following release.  (There won't be 1.6.6-bugfix1,
right?)

Cheers,
Andrew





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]