[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes
|
From: |
Szakacsits Szabolcs |
|
Subject: |
Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:35:21 +0200 (MEST) |
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Andrew Clausen wrote:
>
> I had a look at the images. The LBA flag is enabled. Therefore, I don't
> think this problem is related to CHS issues.
Irrelevant. Bootloaders, mini-drivers are free to ignore LBA flag for
whatever many reasons.
Szaka
- parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew A., 2004/09/16
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/19
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/22
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes,
Szakacsits Szabolcs <=
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/23
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2004/09/24
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/24
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2004/09/25
- Re: parted's cp command for FAT32, and LBA/CHS/NTLDR missing woes, Andrew Clausen, 2004/09/25