Re: Parted 1.6.21

[Sven Luther]

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 11:40:40AM -0500, Mathieu Bruneau wrote:
> Harley D. Eades III wrote:
> >Mathieu Bruneau <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >
> >>I just updated the website for this new version with a direct link to
> >>it and a fix in the TOC order (CVS access was after Documentation but
> >>that wasn't the same as the document real order)
> >>
> >
> >Nice, how about adding GNU/Hurd as one of the supported operating systems?
> >
> >Thanks
> >hde
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Bug-parted mailing list
> >address@hidden
> >http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
> >
> I added that information as well. A few time ago Sven asked for links to 
> different distribution's parted package but as for the gnu website I'm 
> not supposed to link to any page containing non-free software. So 
> most(if not all) distribution links are "not welcome" on gnu.org page.

Huh ? since when is parted packaged version for the different distribs
considered non-free ? There must be some reality strange thing going on at the
FSF if they forbid to link to the actual parted package page. What and they
releasing documentation under non-free licence anyway and such.

Friendly,

Sven Luther