[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parted 1.6.21
From: |
Sven Luther |
Subject: |
Re: Parted 1.6.21 |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:40:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:37:08PM -0500, Mathieu Bruneau wrote:
> I think you totally misunderstood me... I never claimed that parted
No, well, fsf, debian and freeness is a long unrational dispute.
> (debian or not) is or contains in any way non-free things. I think I
> misunderstood the webmaster's guideline too on the gnu.org website.
> After rereading it I don't see anything against linking to the parted
> package on the different distribution. I'll add the debian,fedora
> packages in a few mins. If you have any that you would like me to add
> just send an email with the appropriate link!
make sure to link to both the unstable and experimental packages, and maybe
hint at the parted subversion repo on sv.debian.org.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
- Parted 1.6.21, Andrew Clausen, 2005/01/15
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Harley D. Eades III, 2005/01/16
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Mathieu Bruneau, 2005/01/16
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Harley D. Eades III, 2005/01/16
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Mathieu Bruneau, 2005/01/18
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Sven Luther, 2005/01/18
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Mathieu Bruneau, 2005/01/18
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Sven Luther, 2005/01/18
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Mathieu Bruneau, 2005/01/18
- Re: Parted 1.6.21,
Sven Luther <=
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Mathieu Bruneau, 2005/01/18
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Sven Luther, 2005/01/19
- Re: Parted 1.6.21, Andrew Clausen, 2005/01/18
Re: Parted 1.6.21, Sven Luther, 2005/01/29