[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: parted NAME <part> <name> Vs mkdosfs -n <name>
From: |
leslie . polzer |
Subject: |
Re: parted NAME <part> <name> Vs mkdosfs -n <name> |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:32:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mutt-ng/devel-r802 (Linux) |
Hello John,
I'm having trouble understanding you... some questions:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:00:12PM -0700, John Galloway wrote:
> Answering my own question: NAME isn't supported for msdos partitions
What do you mean by "NAME"?
> the bug here is two fold.
Do you mean within Parted?
> 1) that it doesn't complain but silently does nothing,
What is "it" and when does it complain?
> 2) that it isn't supported for msdos partitions.
IIRC Parted does not support naming file systems at all, only
partitions, where supported by partition table.
Leslie
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
pgpzOvnGwTArZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature