bug-parted
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FDISK versus PARTED


From: Vilmar Klemt
Subject: FDISK versus PARTED
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:20:49 +0000

Dear Fran├žois,

do you mean FDISK? I can't find FSDISK.

PARTED has worked well for me all the time.

Occasionally I need repartitioning, so I preferred PARTED
generally over FDISK.

I encountered only one peculiar problem with PARTED:
Starting and end addresses "sometimes" are accepted only,
in very coarsely grained sizes, so e.g. 7.1 GB instead of
7.1234 GB (or 7123.4 MB). "Sometimes" means, this behavior turned
out to differ between versions or even between different machines
(with the same version numbers).

Does your remark mean you consider PARTED less reliable than
FDISK?

Regards,

Vilmar Klemt




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]