[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH] use di-set module rather than hash: easier-to-us
Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH] use di-set module rather than hash: easier-to-use, more efficient
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:18:23 +0100
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/188.8.131.52-0.4-desktop; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )
> Here's that same patch, rebased, and with two small additions:
> - update gnulib to the latest, to get di-set
> - add to m4/.gitignore
> Any objection?
This looks reasonable.
One of the things I would soon like to fix is to make --dry-run work for
patches which modify the same file twice (bug 25860) which will require to
keep the intermediary results around. Another is to fix git-style criss-cross
renames (bug 31058); this will require to keep the original files around.
My initial idea was to switch to a name based cache instead of the device /
inode number based cache as part of that, but maybe there is a better way.