[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH 00/15] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

From: Andreas Gruenbacher
Subject: Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH 00/15] *** SUBJECT HERE ***
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:14:55 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )


On Saturday 26 March 2011 14:31:55 Jim Meyering wrote:
> In the interest of getting patch into a form
> that will integrate more easily with diffutils,
> here are some changes that make most of gnulib's
> syntax-check rules pass (the others are skipped for now).
> The changes cover a mixture of style, portability, safety,
> and increasing consistency with other GNU packages.

thanks, I like this.  I only have one nit-picking comment.

> Jim Meyering (15):
>   maint: use gnulib's maintainer-makefile module
>   maint: arrange for the sc_require_config_h_first test to pass
>   maint: add some m4 quoting
>   maint: remove trailing blanks
>   maint: allow the sc_prohibit_empty_lines_at_EOF test to pass
>   maint: avoid non-portable use of test -a
>   build: accept new configure-time option --enable-gcc-warnings
>   tests: temporarily disable failing syntax-check rules

You have sc_prohibit_always-defined_macros in local-checks-to-skip twice here.

>   build: avoid three gcc warnings
>   maint: update copyright date year ranges to include 2011
>   maint: update bootstrap and gnulib submodule
>   maint: use gnulib's progname module
>   maint: remove now-unneeded macro definitions
>   build: don't turn off -Wmissing-prototypes
>   build: don't turn off -Wmissing-declarations


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]