[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-recutils] A new field type?
From: |
OLLIER Jean-François |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-recutils] A new field type? |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:37:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Would you consider using the dot notation in the records chain notation?
I.e. If many records recursively reference other records, we may find this:
record1:field_depth1:field_depth2:value that could be replaced with:
record1.field_depth1.field_depth2.value
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>
> I am reconsidering the usage of compound field names for making
> references. ...
> We can reserve the compound field names to implement some other facility
> in the future.
>
> --
> Jose E. Marchesi address@hidden
> GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
--
Jean-François OLLIER
mailto:address@hidden