[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:35:11 +0300 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> It should be easy to construct a set of symlinks for which tar-1.23.90
> does the wrong thing. Please see below for a first cut at an example.
Yes, indeed. You've convinced me.
> Can we attack this problem by recording the dev,ino pair for each name
> instead?
Yes, we can. All the more that we do that already for the directories.
I'll try to rewrite the stuff this way.
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2010/07/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2010/07/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Joerg Schilling, 2010/07/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Joerg Schilling, 2010/07/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] segfault getting cwd with --listed-incremental, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2010/07/17