[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:40:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 08/19/2012 12:31 AM, shift wrote:
> /$ ls -alh
> ls: klogd: No such file or directory/
This does not appear to be a bug in 'tar', since no matter what
'tar' does, it cannot create a link that is both there (so
that readdir sees it) and not there (so that lstat does not
see it). Conceivably it is a bug in 'ls', but most likely
it's a bug in your kernel or file system. You can try to start
debugging it by invoking 'strace ls -alh' and inspecting the
system calls that deal with klogd.
- [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, shift, 2012/08/18
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/18
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/18
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, shift, 2012/08/18
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, shift, 2012/08/18
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/18
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/18
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, shift, 2012/08/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, shift, 2012/08/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, shift, 2012/08/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, shift, 2012/08/19
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible bug in 1.26 version ?, Joerg Schilling, 2012/08/20