[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:32:54 +0300 |
Pavel Raiskup <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> tar -cvvf test.tar -T LIST1 -T LIST1 -T LIST2
>
> Before these changes, tar failed immediately (before even tried to store
> files defined in LIST1). Now it firstly stores everything from FILE1 and
> then fails (it may take hours to process FILE1 to reach this failure).
Ah, that's important indeed. Thanks for spotting that! Actually, the
main reason why tar checks for the same file being read twice is to
avoid recursive inclusion (e.g. "-T LIST1" appearing in LIST1 itself).
So perhaps tar should allow subsequent (as opposed to recursive) reads of
the same file?
Regards,
Sergey
- [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2013/08/04
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Pavel Raiskup, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Pavel Raiskup, 2013/08/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2013/08/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Pavel Raiskup, 2013/08/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Christian Wetzel, 2013/08/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Pavel Raiskup, 2013/08/15
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Pavel Raiskup, 2013/08/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2013/08/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Pavel Raiskup, 2013/08/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2013/08/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] tar -T option, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2013/08/16
- [Bug-tar] [PATCH] tar -T option, Pavel Raiskup, 2013/08/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] tar -T option, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2013/08/19