[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29
From: |
Rob Gross |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29 |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Sep 2016 14:19:48 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.03 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) |
Hi, Jack,
You wrote:
> It would be helpful if you confimed what the linkages for gtar
> looked like with...
>
> otool -L /usr/local/Cellar/gnu-tar/1.29/bin/gtar
$ otool -L /usr/local/bin/gnutar
/usr/local/bin/gnutar:
/usr/local/lib/libintl.8.dylib (compatibility version 10.0.0, current
version 10.3.0)
/usr/local/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 8.0.0, current
version 8.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
version 1226.10.1)
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation
(compatibility version 150.0.0, current version 1258.1.0)
/Users/gross/local/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
current version 1.0.0)
> and double check that you don't have any headers or libs for
> libiconv, gettext, and libintl accidentally installed in /usr/local
> (to make sure you aren't ending up with mismatched headers and libs
> during the tar build).
They are all installed in /usr/local. I'm not using homebrew or any
similar systems--I install programs manually (metaphorically).
There's no possibility of conflict, because those are the only copies
on the system, as far as I know. I ran "make check" before installing
each, and no errors were reported.
> ps I suspect you will also find that passing --disable-nls to
> configure during the tar build will also suppress your problem.
Correct. Does that help in any way to narrow down the source of the
bug?
> Also, I suspect that building tar against libiconv without
> gettext is poorly tested on OS X.
gettext is also installed. I'm not sure why it's not showing up on
the list above, because it's in /usr/local/lib. I think that tar is
calling xgettext instead, based on the references to xgettext in
Makefile.
Incidentally, running "gdb" on the latest Mac OS is a pain--Apple
thought for some reason that it was a security risk. Running "lldb,"
the default debugger, told me nothing.--Rob
--
Rob Gross (617) 552-3758
Department of Mathematics http://fmwww.bc.edu/gross/
Boston College address@hidden
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467-3806
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/09/04
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Rob Gross, 2016/09/04
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/05
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29,
Rob Gross <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/05
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] Small bug in tar-1.29, Jack Howarth, 2016/09/06