[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed |
Date: |
Mon, 07 May 2012 10:25:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.7.4 (Linux/3.1.10-1.9-desktop; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Left-overs from previous installations can easily break that assumption.
This is precisely what I'm asking to be fixed, because ...
> IOW, this will work reliably only if "someone" (a person) is carefully
> managing her installations, making sure there's only one instance of
> each manual in all the directories mention in INFOPATH
... this is
1. not a practical assumption, and
2. is against the spirit of the GNU standards, which allow any program
to be installed in any location (via configure option --prefix).
Bruno
- info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/06
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/06
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/06
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/06
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/06
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/06
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/06
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/07
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/07
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/07
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/07
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Bruno Haible, 2012/05/07
- Re: info: INFOPATH interpretation severely flawed, Karl Berry, 2012/05/06