[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:42:34 +0200 |
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 05:21:04PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> It seems that EPUB standards compliance is more important (as far as
> EPUB itself is important) than HTML standards compliance. The EPUB
> format appears to be fairly concisely and precisely defined, as far
> I can tell, when compared with HTML, and may be more stable.
For some parts of the EPUB standard, this is true, but for the content,
it is the mostly same as HTML, as it defers to the ever changing HTML
standard.
--
Pat
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, (continued)
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Gavin Smith, 2024/08/21
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/08/21
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Daniel Cerqueira, 2024/08/21
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Gavin Smith, 2024/08/21
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Daniel Cerqueira, 2024/08/21
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Per Bothner, 2024/08/21
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/08/21
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/08/21
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/08/21
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/08/22
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/08/23