bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] [wget-bug #32357], IPv6 addresses not formatted..


From: Giuseppe Scrivano
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] [wget-bug #32357], IPv6 addresses not formatted..
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:05:58 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)

thanks.  The patch is not complete yet, it doesn't fix the other message
I have reported before.  Can you please check it as well?  Can you
provide a ChangeLog file entry?

Cheers,
Giuseppe



Sasikanth <address@hidden> writes:

> I had modified the patch as you guys suggested.
> For ipv6 the display will be [ipv6address]:port
> for ipv4   ipv4address:port
>
> The test results
>
> IPv4
> -------
>
> address@hidden wget-1.13.4]# ./src/wget http://10.0.0.1
> --2012-01-07 11:01:23--  http://10.0.0.1/
> Connecting to 10.0.0.1:80...
>
> IPv6
> -------
> address@hidden wget-1.13.4]# ./src/wget http://[3ffe:b80:17e2::1]
> --2012-01-07 11:01:06--  http://[3ffe:b80:17e2::1]/
> Connecting to [3ffe:b80:17e2::1]:80
>
> Thanks
> Sasi
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Henrik Holst
> <address@hidden>wrote:
>
>> Exactly! That is how atleast I have akways seen address and port
>> combinations been presented (or entered).
>>
>> /hh
>> Den 6 jan 2012 21:27 skrev "Micah Cowan" <address@hidden>:
>>
>> I believe hh's suggestion is to have the format reflect the way it would
>>> look in a URL; so [ and ] around ipv6, and nothing around ipv4 (since ipv4
>>> format isn't ambiguous in the way ipv6 is).
>>>
>>> (Sent by my Kindle Fire)
>>> -mjc
>>> Sent from my Kindle Fire
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Sasikanth <address@hidden>
>>> *Sent:* Fri Jan 06 01:56:34 PST 2012
>>> *To:* address@hidden
>>> *Cc:* address@hidden
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] [wget-bug #32357], IPv6 addresses not
>>> formatted..
>>>
>>> Currently we are not checking family type of the address before printing
>>> the message.
>>>
>>> Do we have to print the message as [3ffe:b80:17e2::1]:80 for ipv6 and
>>>
>>> |10.0.0.1|:80 for ipv4?
>>>
>>> Please confirm so I will resubmit patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sasi
>>>
>>>
>>> Note: I didn't get the reply to my mail, to keep track the discussion I
>>>
>>> had copied the mail content from the mailing list.
>>>
>>> Shouldn't IPv6 addresses be displayed like this instead:
>>> [3ffe:b80:17e2::1]:80
>>>
>>> /hh
>>> Den 5 jan 2012 14:15 skrev "Sasikanth" <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> >  Hi,
>>> >
>>> >  This very small change related to display issue.
>>> >  The  bug id is 32357
>>> "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?32357";;
>>>
>>> >
>>> >  When we run wget
>>>   with
>>> an ip address alone  (wget 10.0.0.1 or wget
>>> > http://10.0.0.1/ or wget http://[3ffe:b80:17e2::1])
>>> >  the display shows as
>>>
>>> >
>>> >  IPV4
>>> >  Connecting to 10.0.0.1:80...
>>> >  IPV6
>>> >  Connecting to 3ffe:b80:17e2::1:80   (Because of IPV6 format (ff::01)
>>> it is
>>> > little hard differentiate the ipv6 address and port number)
>>>
>>> >
>>> >  This patch will show the display
>>> >
>>> >  IPV4
>>> >  Connecting to |10.0.0.1|:80...
>>> >  IPV6
>>> >  Connecting to |3ffe:b80:17e2::1|:80
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Sasi
>>>
>>>
>
> --- src/connect.c.orig        2012-01-07 09:39:55.965324001 +0530
> +++ src/connect.c     2012-01-07 10:54:08.295324000 +0530
> @@ -293,7 +293,12 @@
>                                         xfree (str);
>          }
>        else
> -        logprintf (LOG_VERBOSE, _("Connecting to %s:%d... "), txt_addr, 
> port);
> +       {
> +           if (ip->family == AF_INET)
> +               logprintf (LOG_VERBOSE, _("Connecting to %s:%d... "), 
> txt_addr, port);
> +           else if (ip->family == AF_INET6)
> +               logprintf (LOG_VERBOSE, _("Connecting to [%s]:%d... "), 
> txt_addr, port);
> +       }
>      }
>  
>    /* Store the sockaddr info to SA.  */



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]