[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] Problem using GNU Wget 1.11.4 Windows version

From: Henrik Holst
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] Problem using GNU Wget 1.11.4 Windows version
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:49:46 +0100

It's strange though that he gets different sha256 for each download even if
the problem should be in sha256sum?

I did download the file with Wget v1.12 on Ubuntu and got the same
sha256sum as the one from the CHECKSUM file. So I did calculate the md5 so
that JD can check that aswell:

address@hidden:~$* sha256sum Fedora-16-i386-DVD.iso
address@hidden:~$* md5sum Fedora-16-i386-DVD.iso
0d64ab6b1b800827a9c83d95395b3da0  Fedora-16-i386-DVD.iso


2012/3/19 Paul Wratt <address@hidden>

> you should be using at least the last know stable version 1.12 but
> that is still at least 5 years old
> 1.13 versions are from within the last 12+months
> but I have a feeling that the sha256sum you are using is not right,
> verify against the md5 (maybe google for it)
> Paul
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:24 AM, JD <address@hidden> wrote:
> > When using wget with the -c option, it does recover and resume the
> download
> > after network failures. However, after it finishes the download (in my
> case
> > downloading
> > Fedora-16-i386-DVD.iso), I run the sha256sum on the downloaded ISO and
> it is
> > completely different to the value stored in the file of CHECKSUMS on the
> > same
> > page URL - http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/16/Fedora/i386/iso/
> >
> > I downloaded this iso at least twice, with the same result - the
> sha256sum
> > performed on the file does not match the one at the above URL, and nor
> > does it match the result of sha256sum performed on the previous downloads
> > of the iso file.
> >
> > So, something is not right with wget!!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]