[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

From: Tim Rühsen
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:33:05 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.9-1-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano:
> Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden> writes:
> >> In my understanding, all new general patches should go into 'master', 
> >> regarding metalink/multithreading should go into (experimental) 
> >> wget' for later merging with 'master'.
> >
> > obviously it has to be into master too, thanks to have reported it.  I
> > am going to cherry-pick from parallel-wget into master.
> I have checked it, but I don't think that master needs this fix (the
> patch includes also an improvement, but nothing blocking to be on master
> ASAP).  Can you confirm this?

Some people stumbled upon the _PC_NAME_MAX stuff when compiling for Windows.
Just search the last 2 months for '_PC_NAME_MAX'.

I wondered why  Bykov Aleksey recommends ' Replace "_PC_NAME_MAX" with "256" 
in  url.c:1620. Then run ...' (12th June). Since Rays patch should handle 
that. I'm shure I also send (at least one) patch regarding this issue, but I 
think it/they got lost or something.

However, it boils up and up again, but it is not a blocker that needs to be 
fixed ASAP. It's just annoying.

Regards, Tim

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]