Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] Implement --keep-badhash to keep Metalink's files with a bad hash

[Tim Ruehsen]

On Friday, August 5, 2016 9:58:44 AM CEST Matthew White wrote:
> > > I posted 0001 and 0002 before (see links above), I attach them here too.
> > 
> > Did you see that I answered to 0001 (security considerations) !?
> > So I just applied 0002 and tested with your archive unpacked.
> > Likely that is why valgrind complained...
> > 
> > Tim
> 
> Yes, I saw. I'm evaluating the situation.

Ok, good to know.

> I have to rebase my branch over the master, so I have a clear view of the
> commits not yet applied.
> 
> Did I forget to reply to some messages?

Now we are in sync again, question doesn't apply any more :-)

> Over which commit are you working on?

You should rebase regularly onto latest master, at least before you send a 
patch. That way, you take workload from the maintainers.
And try to work with branches if you are working on more than one issue at the 
same time.

That way, you can do conflict-less fast-forward merges to master (most of the 
time), resp. the maintainer has less headaches when applying your patches. 

Tim

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.