bug-wget
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug-wget Digest, Vol 188, Issue 6


From: Tim Rühsen
Subject: Re: Bug-wget Digest, Vol 188, Issue 6
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 17:34:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 6/10/24 02:21, David Niklas wrote:
It means that a URL has been found and it now is checked whether it
will be enqueued into the list of to-be-downloaded URLs. These
checks are e.g. if the URL is parsable/valid, has a known scheme
(HTTP or HTTPS), isn't already known, matches filters etc. One of
the next lines will tell you whether the URL was actually enqueued
or whether it has been sorted out (the reason is given as well).

I'd prefer it if wget2 wasn't so chatty. Knowing what is DL'ed is
useful, what's enqueued is okay-ish, but when wget2 starts listing
off every URL it's found I find it to be too verboten IMHO.

I am open to changes here, this is not set in stone.

I'm tempted to offer to make these 2 changes myself, but I've not signed
any GNU copyright release form thing yet and, because I'm a student, I'd
basically only be able to contribute a small change here or there.

What do you think?

I absolutely appreciate it!
Wget/Wget2 is a community project :)

"Trivial" changes can be accepted without the FSF copyright assignment. The rule of thumb is if your summed contributions are below 15 lines of code, it is trivial. But it also depends, e.g. changing 100 lines from info_printf to debug_print may also be trivial.

I'll attach the copyright assignment file, just in case you consider signing it (can also be found as gnulib/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future in the wget2 main repo after doing `./bootstrap`).

Thanks,
David

Regards, Tim

Attachment: request-assign.future
Description: Text document

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]