Re: [Bug-zile] Regression tests on stable?

[Reuben Thomas]

On 31 January 2012 13:42, Gary V. Vaughan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Seems like it will be easier moving forward if we don't need to worry
> about what regressions were discovered in what branch, and just put all
> regressions on all live branches.

Agreed.

> Unless the C branch will give birth to any more releases, in which case
> no sense on spending time polishing it...

Do you mean "won't give birth"? In any case, it's worth keeping it
alive for now, or at least in touch (for example, other people have
indicated they are interested in hacking it), so it might as well at
least carry tests so it's obvious where it's up to. Currently it
passes all tests and I'm still fixing bugs.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org