[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-announce] [SECURITY] Buffer-overrun in some uses of read-u8vect
[Chicken-announce] [SECURITY] Buffer-overrun in some uses of read-u8vector
Sun, 18 May 2014 13:27:36 +0200
Hello CHICKEN users,
A problem was found with the read-u8vector! procedure from the srfi-4
unit, which is almost identical to CVE-2013-4385 (which related to
the read-string! procedure, see
If read-u8vector! is called with #f as the "NUM" argument, it didn't
bound the read to the u8vector's size, resulting in a buffer overrun
which may lead to general corruption of the stack or heap, and can
potentially be used to execute arbitrary code.
This has been fixed with changeset 1d06ce7e21c7e903ca5dca11fda6fcf2cc52de5e
All currently released CHICKENs are vulnerable to this bug: this includes
stable versions up until 188.8.131.52, and all 4.8.x development snapshots.
CHICKEN 4.9.0 and a possible 184.108.40.206 will include the fix, as will all
development snapshots starting with 4.9.1.
Like CVE-2013-4385, only code that uses the destructive read-u8vector!
variant with #f as a length argument is vulnerable. A similar workaround
helps in this case: Convert all (read-u8vector! #f buf ...) calls to
(read-u8vector! (u8vector-length buf) buf ...), or, if possible, use the
safe, non-destructive read-u8vector version from the srfi-4 unit.
A quick scan of the egg repository indicates that only two eggs use
read-u8vector! in a potentially unsafe way. The (currently unreleased)
r7rs egg's read-bytevector! procedure maps to read-u8vector!, so any
program using that with #f as the length argument is susceptible to this
vulnerability. The srfi-27 egg's entropy-source-u8vector procedure also
indirectly exposes the read-u8vector! vulnerability, but it is
undocumented that a LENGTH of #f is allowed.
This means that applications should be safe if they don't call
read-u8vector! directly with a #f size and use only documented
functionality of released eggs.
The CHICKEN team
- [Chicken-announce] [SECURITY] Buffer-overrun in some uses of read-u8vector,
Peter Bex <=