[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #1014 and minor cleanup of posix{w
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #1014 and minor cleanup of posix{win, unix} implementations |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2013 20:27:49 -0500 |
OK, I didn't see this because it wasn't attached to the ticket. I posted an
alternate patch on #1014 which just addresses the "old data" problem in
string->time. As far as I can tell, the various uses of C_tm can not interfere
with each other and all one needs to do is initialize C_tm to a sane default
just prior to calling strptime. Does that look correct?
On May 24, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Attached is a bit of a nasty patch which slightly cleans up the even
> nastier C macro hackery in posixunix/posixwin/posix-common.
>
> This fixes #1014, which was created by David Krentzlin today.
>
> I'd appreciate if someone could test whether this does not break
> anything on Windows. The posixwin.scm change is pretty small,
> but you never know :)
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
> --
> http://www.more-magic.net
> <0001-Some-shuffling-about-and-fixing-of-the-POSIX-time-ha.patch>_______________________________________________
> Chicken-hackers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers