[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimpl
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:23:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Peter Bex scripsit:
> It's marked as unimplemented, only the implementation itself is removed.
> The posixunix version is kept around because people may actually be
> using it.
In that case, the posixwin implementation should throw an "Unsupported
on Windows" exception, as for fork() and other such things.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion
that optimum or inadequate performance in the trend of competitive
activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity,
but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be
taken into account. --Ecclesiastes 9:11, Orwell/Brown version
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows, Michele La Monaca, 2014/08/02
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows, Peter Bex, 2014/08/03
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #819 by marking file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows, Peter Bex, 2014/08/03