Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/5] List scrutiny special cases

[John Cowan]

Felix Winkelmann scripsit:

> Wow, cool. I have to try these patches out. But note that hardcoding
> special cases for SRFI-1 procedures is moot, since these will be
> thrown of the core system, sooner or later (or in other words: there
> will be only internally used variants, possibly with less error
> checking).

Eventually, there should be a way for eggs to add types to the scrutinizer
database through a public API of some kind.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        address@hidden
You're a brave man! Go and break through the lines, and remember while
you're out there risking life and limb through shot and shell,
we'll be in here thinking what a sucker you are!    --Rufus T. Firefly