Re: [Chicken-hackers] Bug in numbers egg (perhaps in scrutiny)

[Peter Bex]

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:38:24AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> The following script works correctly in csi, but produces a warning in csc:
> 
> (use numbers)
> (define (foo x) (odd? x))
> 
> The output is as follows:
> 
> Warning: in toplevel procedure `foo':
>   (foo.scm:2) in procedure call to `numbers#odd?', expected 2 arguments, but 
> was given 1 argument
> 
> If you comment out "(use numbers)", there is no warning.

Hi John,

Thanks for reporting this.  I've already fixed this a while ago:
https://bugs.call-cc.org/changeset/31835/release/4/numbers/trunk/numbers.types

There will be a new major numbers release before the end of January
which will include this fix.