[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] extracting srfi-1 from chicken 5

From: Felix Winkelmann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] extracting srfi-1 from chicken 5
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:19:29 +0100 (CET)

> If the mini-srfi-1 stuff is only (to be) required in operator position
> it could be given as syntax.

Right, depending on how much code is generated. Operators that don't
include a loop are likely to be inlined by the compiler, anyway, who
takes care of avoiding the duplication of values in argument position,
and so on.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]