Re: [patch] initial support for functors in csm

[Pietro Cerutti]

On Oct 12 2023, 08:00 UTC, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@gahr.ch> wrote:
> I haven't tackled (module NAME = FUNCTORNAME BODY ...) yet, but I can 
> do that if there's consensus on this first part.

As it turns out, this was already trivially matched by the regular 
module definition form: ('module name _ . body).

I've added an alternative clause to make it explicit that we're matching 
the functor instantiation form, and to avoid recursively scanning the 
functor name.

The updated patch and set of example files is attached. The 
instantiations of the binop functor rely on this form.

--
Pietro Cerutti
I have pledged to give 10% of income to effective charities
and invite you to join me - https://givingwhatwecan.org

csm-functor-support-2.patch
Description: Text document

arith.mix.scm
Description: Text document

arith.num.scm
Description: Text document

arith.scm
Description: Text document

arith.str.scm
Description: Text document

binop.plus.scm
Description: Text document

binop.scm
Description: Text document

binop.times.scm
Description: Text document

main.scm
Description: Text document

num.scm
Description: Text document

str.scm
Description: Text document