[Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros

[Chicken Trac]

#394: implicit renaming macros
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  sjamaan            |       Owner:  felix                        
      Type:  enhancement        |      Status:  closed                       
  Priority:  not urgent at all  |   Milestone:  4.7.0                        
 Component:  expander           |     Version:  4.6.x                        
Resolution:  fixed              |    Keywords:  ir-macros, reverse, er-macros
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by sjamaan):

 Here's a patch for the manual. I've also added a few words to the ER macro
 text, as well as fixed a potential bug in the "cond" example (the
 recursive call to cond wasn't renamed).  Since it's a tutorial, we might
 as well be pedantic. I've added an explanation of this potential bug to
 the tutorial too.

 By the way, what do you think about changing the ER macro examples to
 explicitly use er-macro-transformer?  This would make it a little clearer
 I think (less people wondering "why do we need to use ir-macro-transformer
 here but nothing there?")

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/394#comment:3>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.