[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] The Test Infrastructure

From: Sergey Khorev
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] The Test Infrastructure
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:53:06 +0300

1. No 'setup' actions (in XP terminology).
2. Adding 'teardown' actions looks too imperative (and uncomfortable)
rather that declarative (declarative approach can be observed in
3. It seems that destructor actions will not be called if expectation fails.
4. Testing infrastructure forces the actions without 'expect' to be
put to the 'side-effect' form.
5. I don't like to give names to _every_ expectation.

1+2 lead to a very large and clumsy tests cases.

Although I'm using it anyway =)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]