Re: [Chicken-users] Facilities on top of SRFI 37: args-fold

[felix winkelmann]

On 6/6/05, Zbigniew <address@hidden> wrote:
> args-fold is a neat design, but it can be somewhat complicated (and
> tedious) to use.  I figure most people will write support code to make
> it easier.  Unfortunately I could not find any, so at the risk of
> reinventing the wheel I wrote my own.

Well, I always tend to forget the correct order of arguments for
the options and args-fold procedures. So I find your wrapper highly
interesting.

> I would expect this design to evolve as I use it more.  There are
> things I am not that happy with.  So suggest away.
> 
> Would it make sense to make this or a derivative into an egg?  

Sure.


cheers,
felix