[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Facilities on top of SRFI 37: args-fold

From: felix winkelmann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Facilities on top of SRFI 37: args-fold
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 08:17:03 +0200

On 6/6/05, Zbigniew <address@hidden> wrote:
> args-fold is a neat design, but it can be somewhat complicated (and
> tedious) to use.  I figure most people will write support code to make
> it easier.  Unfortunately I could not find any, so at the risk of
> reinventing the wheel I wrote my own.

Well, I always tend to forget the correct order of arguments for
the options and args-fold procedures. So I find your wrapper highly

> I would expect this design to evolve as I use it more.  There are
> things I am not that happy with.  So suggest away.
> Would it make sense to make this or a derivative into an egg?  



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]