Re: [Chicken-users] Strange hash-table behavior in compiled code

[Alex Shinn]

At Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:42:23 -0400, Raffael Cavallaro wrote:
> 
> On Sep 26, 2005, at 1:51 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
> 
> > Here a patch for extras.scm:
> >
> > 1493d1492
> > <         ((##sys#permanent? x) (##core#inline "C_hashptr" x))
> 
> 
> Not to pick nits, but Felix's patch seems to differ somewhat from  
> Alex's (Felix's is shorter). Alex, what else does your patch do that  
> Felix's doesn't. Does it matter which I apply?

Rule #1: trust the shorter patch
Rule #2: trust the author

My patch was just a more conservative change, reordering cases rather
than removing one, because I didn't know enough about Chicken's GC to
know if that case was safe to remove.  Use Felix's patch, of course.

-- 
Alex