[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed
From: |
Sergey Khorev |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:36:44 +0300 |
fw> I can apply patches myself, and fix the most glaring bugs. But where I
really
fw> need help is with maintaining build issues. That is, testing of mingw,
fw> cygwin and msvc builds. I would also like to have someone to look into
fw> compiling Chicken with Open Watcom.
fw> And providing win32 binaries, of course, once for every major release.
Ok. It seems that Brandon and me can cover these tasks.
I'll take a look what can be done for Open Watcom. If someone wants to use it,
why not? Ppersonally I can't find sufficiently good reason to migrate to Watcom
besides of probability to get slightly better optimised code.
What is your position regarding resurrecting MSVC makefile and creating
Watcom-specific Makefile?
- Re[2]: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, felix winkelmann, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, Bob McIsaac, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. Mingw install?, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/01/11
Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed, felix winkelmann, 2006/01/09
Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. compiler semantics, Bob McIsaac, 2006/01/10