Re: [Chicken-users] Yet another patch for the http egg ``+'' problem...

[felix winkelmann]

Damn. Malformed patch. My bad.

Could everyone send patches as attachment, please?
Copy&pasting them sometimes introduce problems with
line-terminators, etc.


cheers,
felix


On 2/9/06, Peter Busser <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:54:23AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> > On 2/8/06, Peter Busser <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > The following episode in the ``+'' processing saga:
> > >
> > > I've delved a bit more in the http egg's innards and it looks like
> > > http:canonicalize-string is broken and other functions (such as
> > > http:decode-url) dependend on the broken canonicalization function.
> > >
> >
> > I have applied the patch and uploaded the new version.
>
> No you haven't! Cheater!
>
> I just downloaded the egg from the web site and checked the code. The
> http:decode-url function is still the same and so are http:canonicalize-string
> and parse-encoded-arguments.
>
> Groetjes,
> Peter.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>