[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: https

From: Thomas Chust
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: https
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:29:52 +0000 (GMT)

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, DaishiKato wrote:

[...] Thanks. This looks good. I would implement it in http:send-request, though.


I just decided against patching the http-client internals themselves for the "proof of concept" example. Writing a new version of http:GET was less invasive.

Let me work on it, based on your code (if there's no license conflict), and I will come up with a patch.

Sure, go ahead and use the code. If the stuff was to become or be included in an egg, I would put it under a BSD license as usual.

BTW, I'm still not sure about the use of http:request-ip. Your code indicates that is a replacement of host, but it will not work since the default value is "<unknown>". [...]

Hmm, that's right. Maybe it should not be used at all then, or only if it does contain a string matching "\\([0-9]{1,3}\\.\\){3}[0-9]{1,3}".


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]